Showing posts with label Khaleda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Khaleda. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 October 2012

Which way is up, again?

One can study the political climate in Bangladesh until one is blue in the face and not arrive at an answer as to what kind of democracy we practice.

In 20 years of democracy the nation has been brought closer and closer to its knees. Given the current trend and that no respite seems imminent one wonders what kind of a nation we will celebrate in 2021 when Bangladesh turns 50.

Corruption has been ingrained into the very fabric of the nation's psyche – so much so that even the youth engaged in good jobs in the private sector providing good pay are indulging in corrupt practices. It's like no matter how much they make, making some more 'under the table' can only make life more fulfilling.

When I and my contemporaries were in our twenties – which was about that many years ago – I believe we all put in an honest days work. We were not paid as much as we would have wanted probably but there was honesty and dignity in what we did and how we did it.

Boys and girls of the same age in 2012 can't seem to be paid enough to warrant keeping their noses clean or feel loyalty to the company they represent. I don't really blame these young people as the whole country seems swamped by people who benefit by practicing outside a moral code.

Monday, 7 May 2012

Lessons from the French

One cannot look at the papers and not realise that there is a political tsunami running across Europe that is pushing for change in leadership – most of the power from this growing tidal wave of reform finds its source in two areas of the political landscape – need for a much delayed economic reform coupled with xenophobic social turmoils.

Europe had started to increasingly look inwards as the ominous shadow of the Euro zone crisis drew dark clouds over once robust economies that had hedged its bets on more fragile ones. What was considered revolutionary economic tactics in building a strong unified Europe was in another form unsubstantiated optimism that lesser economies would take the correct measures for a stronger united Europe over the health of their own struggling economies.

In a way that is exactly what happened and the Euro zone prospered, until the lesser economies had finally to choose its own health over the economic stability of the whole. In what is probably now a recognised vicious cycle the whole euro zone prospered on anticipated prosperity – loans were provided to pay for loans in the false hope that eventually there would be a surplus (because to think otherwise would be unimaginable).

Friday, 3 February 2012

Why 'Bye bye' seems to be the hardest word

With no disrespect to Elton John or Tom Rice 'Sorry' isn't the hardest word... 'bye bye' seems to be.

There has been a lot of the trouble in the middle east since the beginning of the last year – all because the nations' leaders (dictators, actually in democrat clothing) refuse to step down. Countless of people have been killed and countless lives shattered over the years because autocratic leaders cannot see beyond their self-convictions (thanks equally to ego-stroking by corrupt cronies) that they are best for the people they rule.

In fact to find such leaders one would not have to look just at the middle east but all most anywhere in the world where the checks and balances of democracy have not been fully realised (i.e. places where the constitution is as pliable as putty and can be amended or bent at will, thanks to an opposition that is debate-boycotting, in some cases, or impotent or non-existent, in others).

My homeland Bangladesh would be as good an example as any. Currently we have two women leaders at the helm of the two major political parties – both leaders have inherited the post. One after the assassination of her father (perpetuated to be the 'Father of the Nation') and the other after the assassination of her husband (perpetuated to be the 'Declarer of Independence').

Friday, 8 December 2006

High drama and the original sin

This article is another from my Daily Star Magazine contributions from the turn of the century 2000. I do believe that history does repeat itself, but I would have thought that history repeats itself after the passing of a generation or two! In Bangladesh we are so possessed with "history" that it seems we repeat ourselves (commentary-wise, at least) every turn of a regime. Read and see that nothing has realy changed in the last six years.

This being an election year it is a year of high drama. A year where it’s termed ‘undemocratic’ that the opposition party says it will win in the same sentence that the party in position ‘democratically’ declares its expected victory. I can understand and condone the statements because an election result in this country has traditionally been only as fair as the party that wins declares it to be. After all each party competes with the tacit understanding that it will only lose if the elections have been rigged! Therefore the forthcoming elections will be both “fair” and “rigged” – the quotes will be attributed according to results. If there is one sure statement that will encapsulate the up-coming election results in a nutshell it is that “the Awami League will not lose; but neither will the BNP.”

There will be a loser in the next elections, and it will sadly be the people who do not feel the need to politicise their day-to-day living. These people choose nothing more than to lead an economically-sound and relatively crime-free existence between work and family (I say ‘relatively’ crime-free, because you can never be too sure of the tax equation). These people are not busy trying to con the upper-hand or milk the ‘connection’, they lead an honest life and pay more than their fair share of dues to society. They are the educated middle-class – a class most countries swear by, a class that builds nations and brings down regimes. Sadly though in this country, they are the forgotten and neglected majority. The brunt of the face-saving hartals and the crime falls on them – they far from the palatable comfort of “easy come easy go” because it has never been “easy come” for them. They are the people who repay their bank loans on time, balance their budgets and report most of their income for taxes.

As another new batch of eligible voters enter the fray, unfortunately they are condemned to live the rest of their natural lives in political turmoil. Given the life expectancy of the average politician and the short-term memory of the average voter, Bangladesh will wallow in the depths of political ineptitude and corruption for still some time to come. The residue of political dregs that will be left in the wake of our current leadership will take years to drain away and die out, leaving in its path scum that will be harder still to wash away. Short of an act of God or the sudden rude awakening of the dreaded and defeated middle class, will the political culture of unaccountability and profit be stopped in its path. As our corrupt leaders bury themselves in the “my turn” cliché of political depravation and the unfounded lust for material accumulation, we people do little more than watch and engage ourselves in nothing more than arm-chair politics of discontentment and belated erudition. The average Bangladeshi is comfortable in its make believe nest of security, we have little desire to upset whatever semblance of balance we dearly hold onto. Historically we have proven to be people who take to the streets for our rights, not anymore. Suddenly we believe we have too much to lose, choosing to forget that we DO have too much to lose with inaction.

The people that the politicians so earnestly speak for is being tried of their patience – the leaders should remember what they try to remind in their rhetoric that the people will rise for their rights if pushed too far. The people want a democracy, but first they must earn it. The only way to understand the value of democracy is through an educated (and civil) electorate. An electorate that is not only willing to listen to others speak but also willing to act on their own judgement. Sadly the people know what should be done and how they should exercise their voting franchise – they however do not protest even in the full knowledge that their ideas have not been respected. Unfortunately, between the AL and the BNP we have a poor choice in leadership. The next elections will most likely be rigged. Either way, like Zimbabwe, the present ruling party will win and stand in front of their people and declare their allegiance. Unfortunately, when the time comes we will fail to remember to ask what (or who) they are alleging to.

Good governance comes from good leaders, and good leaders from good people. Just as “a nation deserves the leadership it gets”, we deserve whatever future lies in wait for us under the “able” leadership of the two bickering matriarchs of hate and displaced egocentricism. What more can we expect from a democracy run by parties that do not believe in democracy from within.

The original sin of politics in this country has sprouted from the fact that voters are mesmerised with icons and images that outlive its use. Just as Shiekh Hasina, in all her “good” intentions, will be unable to retire from active politics because the “people” will not let her, Khaleda Zia will not be far behind in that her “people” will not follow the BNP without her leadership. Meanwhile the people will wonder as to who has “betrayed” them and are actually stopping these two ladies from stepping down.